Jump to content

Talk:Astrophysical X-ray source

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

X-ray dark star

[edit]

This suggestion of splitting off a separate article on X-ray dark stars is a good one. I have been planning to do just this and am happy to see I'm not alone. Part of my interest stems from wanting to explore this apparent X-ray "dividing line" in the H-R diagram among the giant stars as they cross from the main sequence to become red giants. It would also be an opportunity to explore visual stars with proper names to see which are very weak in X-rays and why. Marshallsumter (talk) 23:24, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Astrophysical X-ray source

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Astrophysical X-ray source's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Wood":

  • From Stellar X-ray astronomy: Wood BE, Linsky JL, Müller HR, Zank GP (2001). "Observational Estimates for the Mass-Loss Rates of α Centauri and Proxima Centauri Using Hubble Space Telescope Lyα Spectra". Ap J. 547 (1): L49–L52. doi:10.1086/318888. Retrieved 2007-07-09.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • From X-rays from Eridanus: Wood KS, Meekins JF, Yentis DJ, Smathers HW, McNutt DP, Bleach RD (1984). "The HEAO A-1 X-ray source catalog". Ap J Suppl Ser. 56 (12): 507–649. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 17:29, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Draco nebula.gif Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Draco nebula.gif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosat 0.75kev diffuse background map.gif Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Rosat 0.75kev diffuse background map.gif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Astrophysical X-ray source. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:46, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Following text/refs (see copy below) re the observation of a "Hard tidal disruption event candidate" - I'm not clear at the moment where best to locate the text/refs in the main "Astrophysical X-ray source" article - Comments/Help Welcome - TIA - Drbogdan (talk) 13:15, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In July 2020, astronomers reported the observation of a "hard tidal disruption event candidate" associated with ASASSN-20hx, located near the nucleus of galaxy NGC 6297, and noted that the observation represented one of the "very few tidal disruption events with hard powerlaw X-ray spectra".[1][2]

References

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:21, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:21, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]